Home All Groups Group Topic Archive Search About
Author
17 Mar 2006 7:00 AM
Bhagat Gurtu
Thanking you in prior order to receipt of advises but anyway it so is.

By way of my most important task, my employer has asked me to see it makes
a database with C#. According to some it whereupons that .NET has a
duality in the expression of the framework of Mono.

Is it that the framework of Mono can be applied similar to scope which be
of the framework of .NET 1.1?

What of the object tetherings?

Bhagat

Author
17 Mar 2006 7:12 AM
Jon Skeet [C# MVP]
Bhagat Gurtu <bhaga***@hindiblogs.com> wrote:
> Thanking you in prior order to receipt of advises but anyway it so is.
>
> By way of my most important task, my employer has asked me to see it makes
> a database with C#. According to some it whereupons that .NET has a
> duality in the expression of the framework of Mono.
>
> Is it that the framework of Mono can be applied similar to scope which be
> of the framework of .NET 1.1?
>
> What of the object tetherings?

Not sure what you mean about the "object tetherings" but Mono is
another CLI implementation, just like .NET is. It doesn't have
everything that .NET has, but it *does* run on platforms other than
Windows (unlike .NET).

--
Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.com>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet   Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/jon.skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too
Are all your drivers up to date? click for free checkup

Author
17 Mar 2006 5:36 PM
Bhagat Gurtu
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 07:12:55 +0000, Jon Skeet[ C# MVP] wrote:

> Not sure what you mean about the "object tetherings" but Mono is
> another CLI implementation, just like .NET is. It doesn't have
> everything that .NET has, but it *does* run on platforms other than
> Windows (unlike .NET).

Im thanking much for your kinds of informations.

Object tethering is principle that is organic to bytes all sitting in same
place but behinds of each other.

Bhagat
Author
17 Mar 2006 7:29 PM
Jon Skeet [C# MVP]
Bhagat Gurtu <bhaga***@hindiblogs.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 07:12:55 +0000, Jon Skeet[ C# MVP] wrote:
>
> > Not sure what you mean about the "object tetherings" but Mono is
> > another CLI implementation, just like .NET is. It doesn't have
> > everything that .NET has, but it *does* run on platforms other than
> > Windows (unlike .NET).
>
> Im thanking much for your kinds of informations.
>
> Object tethering is principle that is organic to bytes all sitting in same
> place but behinds of each other.

I think there must be some mistranslations going on somewhere. A google
search for "object tethering" finds only 16 hits, none of which is
about computing.

--
Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.com>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet   Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/jon.skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too
Author
17 Mar 2006 8:40 PM
Matt
Jon wrote:
Show quoteHide quote
> Bhagat Gurtu <bhaga***@hindiblogs.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 07:12:55 +0000, Jon Skeet[ C# MVP] wrote:
> >
> > > Not sure what you mean about the "object tetherings" but Mono is
> > > another CLI implementation, just like .NET is. It doesn't have
> > > everything that .NET has, but it *does* run on platforms other than
> > > Windows (unlike .NET).
> >
> > Im thanking much for your kinds of informations.
> >
> > Object tethering is principle that is organic to bytes all sitting in same
> > place but behinds of each other.
>
> I think there must be some mistranslations going on somewhere. A google
> search for "object tethering" finds only 16 hits, none of which is
> about computing.

He means interfaces. I suspect he's using a translator to convert
whatever
the native language he uses is (Indian, I would imagine) to English.

I don't recall if mono supports the various database objects.

Matt

Show quoteHide quote
>
> --
> Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.com>
> http://www.pobox.com/~skeet   Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/jon.skeet
> If replying to the group, please do not mail me too
Author
17 Mar 2006 8:43 PM
Jon Skeet [C# MVP]
Matt <matttel***@sprynet.com> wrote:
> > > Object tethering is principle that is organic to bytes all sitting in same
> > > place but behinds of each other.
> >
> > I think there must be some mistranslations going on somewhere. A google
> > search for "object tethering" finds only 16 hits, none of which is
> > about computing.
>
> He means interfaces. I suspect he's using a translator to convert
> whatever
> the native language he uses is (Indian, I would imagine) to English.
>
> I don't recall if mono supports the various database objects.

Hmm... I'm not sure that interfaces really go with the description of
"bytes all sitting in the same place but behinds of each other". To be
honest, I can't think what that *does* mean...

--
Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.com>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet   Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/jon.skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too
Author
18 Mar 2006 7:50 AM
Mike
Show quote Hide quote
"Jon Skeet [C# MVP]" <sk***@pobox.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1e852fd6912b8e2a98cf72@msnews.microsoft.com...
> Matt <matttel***@sprynet.com> wrote:
>> > > Object tethering is principle that is organic to bytes all sitting in
>> > > same
>> > > place but behinds of each other.
>> >
>> > I think there must be some mistranslations going on somewhere. A google
>> > search for "object tethering" finds only 16 hits, none of which is
>> > about computing.
>>
>> He means interfaces. I suspect he's using a translator to convert
>> whatever
>> the native language he uses is (Indian, I would imagine) to English.
>>
>> I don't recall if mono supports the various database objects.
>
> Hmm... I'm not sure that interfaces really go with the description of
> "bytes all sitting in the same place but behinds of each other". To be
> honest, I can't think what that *does* mean...

Sounds like a Union to me - but I'm sure that's not what he's after...

Show quoteHide quote
>
> --
> Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.com>
> http://www.pobox.com/~skeet   Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/jon.skeet
> If replying to the group, please do not mail me too
Author
18 Mar 2006 8:20 AM
Jon Skeet [C# MVP]
Mike <vimakef***@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Hmm... I'm not sure that interfaces really go with the description of
> > "bytes all sitting in the same place but behinds of each other". To be
> > honest, I can't think what that *does* mean...
>
> Sounds like a Union to me - but I'm sure that's not what he's after...

Yes, I wondered about unions. It's about as close as I can think of,
but I'm still not sure...

--
Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.com>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet   Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/jon.skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too
Author
18 Mar 2006 7:41 PM
Mike
"Jon Skeet [C# MVP]" <sk***@pobox.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1e85d319d1e3fb198cf78@msnews.microsoft.com...
> Mike <vimakef***@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> > Hmm... I'm not sure that interfaces really go with the description of
>> > "bytes all sitting in the same place but behinds of each other". To be
>> > honest, I can't think what that *does* mean...
>>
>> Sounds like a Union to me - but I'm sure that's not what he's after...
>
> Yes, I wondered about unions. It's about as close as I can think of,
> but I'm still not sure...

It sounds pretty damn cool though  -- I think whatever it does, Object
Tethering should be in v. 4.0!!
I know whatever it is, many in upper management are going to be very
concerned about it :)

m

Show quoteHide quote
>
> --
> Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.com>
> http://www.pobox.com/~skeet   Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/jon.skeet
> If replying to the group, please do not mail me too
Author
19 Mar 2006 8:02 AM
Jacob
Could it be a simple array?
Author
20 Mar 2006 3:32 AM
Frank Rizzo
Jon Skeet [C# MVP] wrote:
Show quoteHide quote
> Bhagat Gurtu <bhaga***@hindiblogs.com> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 07:12:55 +0000, Jon Skeet[ C# MVP] wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Not sure what you mean about the "object tetherings" but Mono is
>>>another CLI implementation, just like .NET is. It doesn't have
>>>everything that .NET has, but it *does* run on platforms other than
>>>Windows (unlike .NET).
>>
>>Im thanking much for your kinds of informations.
>>
>>Object tethering is principle that is organic to bytes all sitting in same
>>place but behinds of each other.
>
>
> I think there must be some mistranslations going on somewhere. A google
> search for "object tethering" finds only 16 hits, none of which is
> about computing.

I am going to take a shot and say that he is thinking of object binding.



Post Thread options